co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Wednesday, February 5, 2025
I'm Sober. I Use Alcohol with Moderation. I Am Not a Prophet in the Naaman or Monastic Sense. I Dread Those Who Don't Get That
Apart from that, the video is decent for someone taking "Francis" as Pope.
My Distorted Perspective
Brian Holdsworth | 5 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI8MJuTIBQM
What would you do, if you knew for a fact you were not alcoholic, if you had recurrent health issues where alcohol is a boon (as disinfectant and as diuretic, mainly the latter), and lots of people around you concluded you were alcoholic?
By the way, you have used the word prophet very loosely. Not the sense in which a prophet is obliged to take no money, like Elisaeus who excommunicated his servant for taking gifts from Naaman. I would be very angry if I found out lots of Catholics were stamping me as an alcoholic. But I would also be angry if I found out one were treating me, behind my back, without my permission, with only indirect consequences seen before me, as a prophet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment