The FALSE CHURCH OF ANTICHRIST According To Prophecy
Return To Tradition | 7 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7kzhiCaf6A
[quibbles]
5:14 Assisi was 1986 (after I had visited the Vatican), it was the consecration of four bishops that was 1988, by Lefebvre and Castro Mayer. / 33:31 The diocese of Linz was in Germany prior to 1864. It is now Republic of Austria.
10:16 this involves spiritual discernment we 10:18 are which is basically being Guided by 10:20 the teachings of the church and the 10:21 wisdom of scripture read old books read 10:24 the writings of saints read old books 10:26 that were published before the 1950s 10:29 those are your guides those are your 10:30 sure guides along with of course the 10:33 Bible and old 10:35 catechisms
10:34 But do you really want someone to take away teen marriages and angelic movers from St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa, young earth creationism from St. Augustine of Hippo and then Geocentrism from angelic movers (which make it possible) and from young earth creationism (where it's useful to the Distant Star Light Problem)?
Or do you only want someone to take away what your priest approves they should take away?
[highlight:]
this means you need to 11:20 know what the church taught through all 11:22 time and practice that in your life 11:24 whenever it's applicable this is the 11:26 surest way to avoid falling into error is 11:29 by knowing what the church has actually 11:30 taught on things or by being misled by 11:33 modern ideologies that contradict the 11:37 faith
12:26 Why I'm not praying for "Pope Francis" - I don't believe he is the Pope.
Other video, actually stream:
Bishops Blocking Trump's Program May Pay A HUGE Price
Return To Tradition | 7 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9wuSPmBqXI
22:27 Our Lord could not seek for refugee status in the Roman Empire, province of Egypt, since Judaea wasn't an enemy country or (anachronism) flagged for human rights abuses.
However, He did cross a border, from a protectorate, comparable to what Philippines or Guam are to Washington DC, to a province, comparable to any of the 50 states.
Judaea didn't have independent foreign policy, but neither did they have Roman officials, when Herod sent his army to kill infants. Judaea only became a province later, in 6 AD. The census in or just after 6 AD is so well remembered because it was in Judaea, sparked a revolt and that revolt is mentioned by Gamaliel in Acts and by Josephus.
This means, when Joseph went to Bethlehem for the census, it was a joke. His action was comparable to leaving a state to go to Guam or the Philippines to avoid the IRC.
The Holy Family was first tax evading (any Roman census officer in Bethlehem if ever would have been in 6 AD or later), then crossing a half and half "international border" (also anachronism) without doing the paperwork (the paperwork too is anachronism).
The Bishops who say "Our Lord was a refugee" are not lying.
And given the Christian Palestinians are descendants of the population Our Lord founded post mortem Acts 2 and 8 (uniting Judah and Ephraim), and that Muslim Palestinians are an offshot of that, calling Our Lord a Palestinian is about as anachronistic, and absolutely not false, as calling Mozart an Austrian.
Mozart was a German of the Holy Roman Empire, who immigrated to Vienna and thus to the Archduchy of Austria. His birthplace was Salzburg, an Archbishop acted as secular ruler and it was as much outside the Archduchy as Cologne was, though not as far outside. But Salzburg has later become part of the two Republics of Austria, and therefore, calling Mozart an Austrian is anachronistic, but not simply false. The same applies to calling Our Lord Palestinian.
So, it's not leftism, it's simply truth, He was born close to becoming a refugee, and He became after Resurrection the basically first King of Palestine.
22:31 No, he would have been going "from one part of the Roman Empire to another part of the Roman Empire" if He had been born after 6 AD.
He went from a protectorate to a province, the status is not the same.
If He had been born after 6 AD, the Gospel would also have been false, because Herod would no longer have been alive, and his successors would not have had the power to commit the massacre in Bethlehem. Stop contradicting the inerrant words of the Gospel.
22:50 No, comparing Judaea and Egypt to Oklahoma and Texas is certainly valid after 6 AD, it's a total no-go for anything while Herod the Great and then Archaelaus were in power.
For the actual year when the Flight to Egypt happened, it's like going from Guam to the US or from Philippines to US or (prior to Castro) from Cuba to the US. Protectorate to province roughly translates protectorate to state.
23:11 The crime of obstructing justice is involved in things like legal arrests on the purpose of serving justice.
Sheltering someone sought and not for an actual felony, would be a very minor form of obstruction to justice.
23:31 You are aware that your source is Nolan Rappaport?
// Immigration Law Expert and former Judiciary Committee counsel. Around 400 published immigration op-eds* //
// Nolan Rappaport is a lobbyist who lobbied for 1 clients in 2007. //
Lobbying firm: Steptoe & Johnson
Client: Arizona Employers for Immigration Reform
My source for the latter is the site Open Secrets.**
Now, I look them up. The fact is, they are not on the side of Teaparty. Nolan Rappaport could have given, not legal advice to bishops, but simply a kind of worst case scenario if Trump and Vance push criminalising one thing after another, and in the intent of perhaps even demonising Trump and Vance. I thought you had been studying political science?
* https://www.linkedin.com/in/nolan-rappaport-6250333b
** https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/lobbyists/summary?cycle=a&id=Y0000030840L
No comments:
Post a Comment