Allie Beth Stuckey Revisited

What’s Behind Brett Cooper's & Candace Owens’ Reaction to Daily Wire's CEO Departure? | Ep 1158
Allie Beth Stuckey | 20.III.2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEEQK1US7gY

13:39 The abuse was obviously unacceptable, but at 12 she was not a child.

At 12 (and some months) 50 % of young ladies can become pregnant. A person who can become pregnant is not a male, and equally not a child.

16:10 A child may not be able to consent, but at 12, when as said a woman is no longer a child, consent to marriage and therefore also consent to premarital sex has been considered valid consent all over Christian history.

In the 19th C. in response to lots of girls getting trapped in prostitution (as if that were more important than marriage) England raised the age of consent to 13.

In the early 20th C. the Progressive Era, the US involved several states raising the age for marriage to 21 or 18.

EmeryShae

@EmeryShae

Are you nuts? This didn’t happen in the 19th century. Laws were in place. She was absolutely a child and it’s concerning to me that you want to prove otherwise.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@hglundahl

@EmeryShae You may not be nuts, but you are IGNORANT of history.

The Classic laws of marital age in England and colonies (including famous 13 ones) were saying for girls they had to wait to 12, or on other views just to 10. There were parallel and contradictory laws in England.

On the continent, prior to the French Revolution, and Reformations in some other countries, or even after Reformation, depending on country a girl could be married by 12 (France, Spain) or possibly only 14 (Savoy, I think, but could be wrong).

Check out Romeo and Juliet, and read it carefully. Romeo is an adult. He is able to kill in a duel (and that's what puts him into a feud with Juliet's family). The play starts when Juliet has 14 days left until she wwas going to be 14. Her mother tells her that at that age she was already married, I think even already a mother.

That was perfectly legal in Verona as elsewhere. Romeo's love was not forbidden because he was what you would consider a pedophile, but because he was in a feud with the family of his desired bride.

22:24 The Gates of Hell will not prevail against exactly what Church?

You know lots of Protestants (and lots of total non-Christians) have hoped that all of Catholicism comes tumbling down over certain things.

Were you one of them?

24:48 I am rather thankful for statutes of limitation being other than Oklahoma in several parts of Europe, including France.

27:26 There is exactly one justice that take up crimes however long ago.

It's (if I recall correctly) upcoming in the valley of Josaphath.

Romans 13 means that criminals currently unrepentant and continuing should certainly be liable to get charged, but it doesn't mean a man who is likely to have repented a long time ago should be dug up years after the crime, when the victim is at no danger and when there is no new victim.

I am no fan of the Wiesenthal Center, who seem to have been involved in getting Demjanjuk to court in Israel. In the 80's, like forty years after the alleged crime (his implication was disputed, and an Israeli court of appeal actually cleared him at one point) was over.

29:02 I certainly consider her point valid about coming forth.

41:41 Oh, your husband's name is Timothy ... if he reads appropriate epistles by St. Paul, he might end up Catholic.

50:17 Jews are not free from all faults, and if someone says "you dirty Jew" it's not my style, I happen to have Jewish relatives, but it's also not a thing I can write off as totally un-Christian.

In fact, there is spiritual uncleanness in rejecting Christ (like the Jews do), in fake accepting him, while rejecting His Church (which to various degrees Muslims, Protestants and Freemasons do).

If you wish someone to get clean of a spiritual uncleanness, perhaps stating "you dirty X" is preferrable over wishing someone minimum five years in prison decades after the crime.

51:03 When as a child I branded on a piece of wood I long kept "Jesus is Lord" I did not know the full implication of the words.

I wasn't Catholic yet.

I knew Jesus is Lord of the Universe, I knew Jesus is Lord over my life, whether I'm faithful or not.

I did not know Jesus is Lord over one specific Church, which He refuses to abandon.

I did not know that Jesus is Lord over human society.

These two dimensions are resumed in "Christ is King" since His Kingship over the Jews is not just exercised in Heaven, but for 2000 years has been exercised in the Christian population of Palestine, and for lots of these years has been exercised in Catholic States.

Now, lots of people who state "Christ is King" are in fact lamenting the loss of Catholic States and there are in fact Jewish contributions to this loss. I would say even to 19th C. Nationalisms. It's a safe bet that in 1864, Jews had a preference for Prussia over Austria. It's a very safe bet that in 1870 Jews had a preference for Savoy over Austria, Naples and the Papal States.

It's highly probable that in Mexico at a certain time they preferred Benito Juárez and US meddling over the Austrian Emperor of Mexico.

That's why I find it obliging on me to state "Christ is King" ...

59:15 You are aware that Hitler was a part time supporter of Zionism?

There are pictures of boats setting off to Palestine under double flag, Israeli flag (not yet official) and swastika.

Obviously, Protesting Jewish recitals is not the brightest thing to do, I'd prefer them supporting Palestinian ones (unless Trump bans those).

adding:

The 'Saint' Who was Excommunicated and Executed | Girolamo Savonarola
Mere Tradition with Kennedy Hall | 20 March 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUXOUTjG9ZM

12:33 I seem to recall the contemporary version of Hail Mary is his.

In St. Thomas' time, the prayer ended with the name Jesus, as can be indirectly seen from St. Lewis of Montfort's Second method, when the mystery is inserted into the Hail Mary after that in a relative clause.

He added the final prayer, which already existed separately and is actually used separately by the Orthodox.