Anyway, a brief pretended "debunk" by Dan McClellan is not cutting it the other way:
On the “Prophecy of the Popes”
Dan McClellan | 6 March 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXf7kUXJGWY
2:32 Aquila rapax? I think that was Pius VI or VII, either of whom was in some way agressed by Napoleon, an Emperor (aquila) who was at least in Italian eyes, as well as English ones rapacious.
Crux a cruce? Pius IX, who was attacked by Savoy, a previous principality, duchy, which had a cross in the coat of arms and gave that Pope a cross to bear.
You mentioned* Orvieto:
Milan is an old city having been founded in 400 B.C.
[About the Popes from the Twelfth Century to the End of Time
https://www.catholictradition.org/Papacy/prophecies.htm]
Lilium et rosa
[The lily and the rose]
MATEO BARBERINI = Urban VIII (1623-1644)
He was born in 1568 and educated under the Jesuits. In 1601 he was appointed Papal Legate to France and in 1604 Archbishop of Nazareth. Later he was sent as Nuncio to Paris and in 1606 he was made a Cardinal by Paul V. He was elected Pope in 1623 and throughout his reign he concerned himself with the affairs of France and England. He died in 1644.
There is no doubt that his particular interest in the affairs of France (fleur de lis) and England (the rose) seems the most obvious explanation.
Quick google confirms he was:
a) involved in the rivalry between France and "Austria" (HRE + Spain)
b) involved in civil rights for Catholics under English rule
c) involved in abolition of slavery, wait, less concerned with England and France, since he was** on the lines of Bartolomé de la Casas:
In a Bull, dated 22 April, 1639, he strictly prohibited slavery of any kind among the Indians of Paraguay, Brazil, and the entire West Indies.
But a and b, he actually did meddle in the French lily and the English rose, which could obviously be a response to his knowing the prophecy.
However, Aquila Rapax and Crux de Cruce were not similarily able to get produced by target chosing to fulfil it. Like the rule about the Paschal lamb couldn't be fulfilled by Jesus' purely human choice on Calvary.
Lumen in caelo
[A light in the sky]
GIOACHINO PECCI = Leo XIII (1878-1903)
This is the first of Malachy's prophecies for the years after 1590 which appears to be a straightfoward allusion to the Pope's amorial bearings which show a blasing star in the coat of arms. His great encylicals could also be called "a light in the sky"
There was both a comet and a meteor shower in 1878.***
4:51 I would agree that Peter the Roman isn't Antipope Bergoglio.
If Pius XII wasn't Pope, one could link Pastor Angelicus to Michael I, as being devout to the Archangel Michael, and Pastor et Nauta to Michael II, who has arguably cruised between the Philippines and some other places.
Notes:
* An expected Pope not coming from Orvieto.
De antiquitate Urbis = Gregory XIV (1590-1591)
** Pope Urban VIII / Catholic Encyclopedia
https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15218b.htm
*** I checked from a vague memory of a more detailed comment on the prophecy.
https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/895754/view/meteor-shower-1878
No comments:
Post a Comment