- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Wednesday, September 20, 2017
On Susan's Bow
Two Takes on Susan, My Takes on Them · On Susan's Bow
Best medieval weapons for WOMEN
Shadiversity | Ajoutée le 22 déc. 2016
3:24 I think Susan was given a bow because it is not a melee weapon.
Suppose pulling a bow needs same strength or greater strength than swinging Peter's sword Rhindon.
Even so, Susan only pulls it once in order to get rid of two Telmarines (one preferring to flee, when other was down, hit on helmet), while Peter needs to swing his sword clearly more than once in fighting Miraz (and even then was on the loosing edge, if it hadn't been for Glozelle and Sopespian).
5:17 Noting that when a girl uses a weapon to threaten, not attack, Jill is using a dagger, held against the throat of a sleepy guard, not a bow held back more than 30 seconds.
I suppose C. S. Lewis, being an ancient* military, did know what one could expect a girl to achieve with either weapon type.
Would you say Tolkien (also ancient* military) gets anything wrong? Obviously, elves using bows is no problem, since Legolas is obviously stronger, though not looking like it, than Orlando Bloom. Same for dwarfs. And hobbits are mostly using, if anything, short swords (but one bow held in menace, Scouring of the Shire, was it a cross-bow?)
6:01 You just made the case for Susan's archery.
* old, former. I am pansing in terms of Francey ... "ancien militaire"!