Indeed, I search the title of the video, Did Adam & Eve Evolve? w/ Jimmy Akin & Gideon Lazar, and there is not any post here with this content.
I posted one comment, it involved me in debates with one YAJUN YUAN whose comments are now missing, and now I got one comment more.
Did Adam & Eve Evolve? w/ Jimmy Akin & Gideon Lazar
Matt Fradd | 11 March 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orxnSfWHJ0s
2:51 To Gideon Lazar : why after the Flood?
The Ark was a genetic bottleneck for any created kind, including mankind, so there would have been a greater diversity before the Flood!
- YAJUN YUAN
- [missing comment]
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @hglundahl
- YAJUN YUAN Obviously yes, but he'd be wiser to compare shortly before the Flood to now rather than shortly after to now as you agree he is doing.
- YAJUN YUAN
- [missing comment]
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- YAJUN YUAN One cannot conclude "from the ice age" because they had features adapted to the ice age.
So no, Neanderthals would have been pre-Flood too.
- Catholic 'Splaining
- @CatholicSplaining101
- Encyclical: Arcanum, Pope Leo XIII
“We record what is to all known, and cannot be doubted by any, that God, on the sixth day of creation, having made man from the slime of the earth, and having breathed into his face the breath of life, gave him a companion, whom He miraculously took from the side of Adam when he was locked in sleep.”
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- @CatholicSplaining101 Yes, Sir.
But since that sixth day of creation was 2242 or 2262 years before the Flood, this in no way shape or form contradicts what I just said.
No comments:
Post a Comment