No, Jesus was not a Muslim (In the Normal Sense of the Word) — nor a Protestant

When They Tell You Jesus Was a Muslim . . .
Apologetics Roadshow | 5 Dec. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QEHL32CXe4

Eddie had a point that Jesus wasn't a Protestant.

Jesus fasted like some devout Polish Catholics do for Christmas. 40 days. OK, not touching any food this time, that's a bit more radical than even Poles fasting for Christmas.

For lots of the rest of us, we are content with doing the same during Lent (same as Poles for Christmas, usually not the same as the total fast of Jesus) before Easter instead.

Did he say "Ramadan"? That's 29 or 30 days.

Jesus fasted 40 days, like the 40 (intermittent) days of Lent or the 40 days from St. Martin to Christmas (you know, the diehard Polish Catholics).

5:35 You certainly have a point about the mode of fasting.

However, the fact there is a set time is actually not betraying what is an absolute secret.

What is secret is:
a) personally decided fasts
b) how much you actually fast during the Lent before Easter (and, if you are a Pole, those days from St. Martin's to Christmas as well).

6:15 Did they actually refer to Joshua 7:6?

But Josue rent his garments, and fell flat on the ground before the ark of the Lord until the evening, both he and all the ancients of Israel: and they put dust upon their heads
[Josue (Joshua) 7:6]

Fell flat on the ground is a somewhat different gesture from [my bad] that of Jesus Nave ... did Muslims make another equation across millennia and confuse him with Jesus ho Christos? I think when it comes to history, one would have to grade them F.

12:59 I'm sorry, you are using a horrible Bible translation. Here is a better one:

And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women
[Luke 1:28]

The latter being an echo of the praise given to Jael and to Judith. But it's missing from your Bible.

However, your point is about a few verses later:

Behold thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and shalt bring forth a son; and thou shalt call his name Jesus He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the most High; and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of David his father; and he shall reign in the house of Jacob for ever
[Luke 1:31-32]

Fair enough, but get a decent Bible translation. The one I'm using is Douay Rheims in the Challoner revision.

18:16 "the most obvious false prophet ever"

Apart from Marx, with Engels, Darwin and a few more?

25:15 A syllogism (including one syllogism in a polysyllogism) needs three terms to meet in three propositions, two of which involve major or minor term and the middle term, the last of which involves the major and minor term, i e predicate and subject of the last proposition a k a conclusion, and any term is distributed in a proposition if it is either the subject of a universal proposition ("dog" in "all dogs are mammals") or predicate in a negative proposition ("dog" in "no cats are dogs").

The fallacy occurs if the middle term is undistributed in both the first propositions, in both the premisses.

("dog" in "some dogs are French Poodles, some dogs are German Shepherds", "dog" in "some dogs are police dogs, some dogs are working dogs" ... the occurrence of "dog" in both tells us nothing about how the major and minor terms relate, since NO French Poodles are German Shepherds and ALL police dogs are working dogs).