- Q
- What were you taught in school & later found to be untrue? I.e. I was taught that Christopher Columbus discovered America, but my son was taught it was the Native Americans.
https://www.quora.com/What-were-you-taught-in-school-later-found-to-be-untrue-I-e-I-was-taught-that-Christopher-Columbus-discovered-America-but-my-son-was-taught-it-was-the-Native-Americans/answer/Hans-Georg-Lundahl
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- Self Employed at Writer and Composer
- Answered Mon
- That the Earth circles the Sun. OK, one day in school I suspected it, and asked for the physics’ teacher’s proof.
His was, there is a good coordination between planetary masses and orbits as predicted Newtonian way.
However, planetary masses are deduced by the orbits according to the theories of Newtonian physics. I don’t know how many are independently known, for instance by flybys, and if these have really taken place.
Also, supposing the flybys have taken place and proven planetary masses, there are options for Newtonian physics being true (as far as vectorial components for planets are concerned) while Earth is still the centre. Sungenis and his associate in Croatia are giving one of them. Luka Popov, I think his name is.
But while at school, I still accepted the explanation as proof.
- Answered
- by I Jesse Raffield and by II David Hansel
- I
- Jesse Raffield
- Did you ever figure out which orbits which?
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- Mon
- I consider Sun orbits Earth each day, Zodiac each year.
- Jesse Raffield
- Mon · 3 upvotes
- It doesn't bother you that probes on Mars have literally observed the Earth going around the Sun?
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- 11h ago
- You get a camera (film, not stills), a chopper and go circle about a tower. From the chopper you can “literally observe” the tower turning around itself, which in reality it of course does not, standing still on the ground.
You get the idea?
Or you thought I considered Mars as concentric around Earth? No, I am Tychonian. Sun concentric around Earth (outside Moon, inside stars) but other planets concentric around Sun. The relative movements “in solar system” are the same.
- Jesse Raffield
- 11h ago · 1 upvote
- So your reason for believing this is just a case of special pleading? What arbitrary rules your world must work by.
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- 11h ago
- I don’t know how “special pleading” applies to world views.
It applies to arguments.
The world can work by arbitrary rules, if there are arbiters, like angels, or an arbiter, like God.
- Jesse Raffield
- 10h ago · 1 upvote
- Its special pleading in the fact that for no particular reason you claim that the Earth somehow doesn't follow the laws of physics like every other planet.
I see that you're quite religious from your answers and questions, is that why you reject obviously true facts?
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- 5h ago
- The laws of physics would only “dictate” the course of a globe (Earth, Sun or planet) if nothing else is.
If you occasionally move a pen or a keyboard, you have some experience in things that move without physical laws being the prime cause and directive force of the movement - since your will is.
No law of physics is forcing you to type an A if you want to type a B.
Our real difference is whether persons who can move things according to their will come only human sized or come in spiritual mights of infinity (God) or whatever individual globe one is moving (angels).
“why you reject obviously true facts?”
I don’t reject any obviously true fact, since what is “obviously true” to an atheist is not objectively speaking “obviously true”.
- II
- David Hansel
- 20h ago · 1 upvote
- David Hansel
- Please tell me this is a troll answer…
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- 6h ago
- Prepared for a shock?
You have had 14 hours to digest it, take a look at my dialogue with Jesse Raffield.
- David Hansel
- 2h ago
- You’re right, it is a shock to see that someone can so poorly misunderstand the world and how to construct an argument.
- Hans-Georg Lundahl
- 9m ago
- As to “how to construct an argument” I am indeed not impressed by some here.
But you might be referring to someone else than I am referring to?
co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
Heliocentrism (quora)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment