co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Thursday, June 21, 2018
That Blogs Are Credible Sources - At Least on Pocahontas' Real Story
The Messed Up TRUE Story of Pocahontas
TheThings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZMvyfDKMoQ
I got this right ... one source of your criticism of the Disney version is this blog:
https://pamunkeyblogger.wordpress.com/about/ ?
It seems you did:
[Pocahontas & John Smith: fact or fiction?
Research : Posted by Strong Bull on July 14, 2011 in Pamunkey]
https://pamunkeyblogger.wordpress.com/2011/07/14/26/
You know, some guys claim, no one would never take a blog seriously - thank you for proving otherwise!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment