Which Providence is Best?

In 1961 This Little Girl Was Found Adrift At Sea Decades Later She Revealed The Horrifying Truth
watchjojo | 23.II.2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GksOc136NQU

You know, life insurances usually exist for the safety of "Terry Joe" if her mother should die.

The life insurance on her mother was the death sentence of her mother and a death threat to her.

She was saved by God's providence, not by man's modern substitutes for it!

Update

on Saturday 1.IX.2018

Mckenzie .Latham

Just remember folks...anyone who survives any hardship or ordeal only did so becasue god was looking out for them...however by that same logic:

anyone who dies and or is killed just are people god hates and or wants dead since he doesn't save them, most likely because they're just not special or important enough to be allowed to live...

I guess her family just didn’t fit in god’s plan or pissed him off some how and thus needed to die.

that's basically what's being said...

she was lucky nothing more or less…

If god wanted to bless her maybe he should not have allowed a murderer (who he also allowed to kill numerous others without stopping any of those either) to kill her family leaving her with traumatic mental scars for life...

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Anyone who dies is someone God wants dead or allows someone to kill.

In some cases it is because He wants their good. The right moment to die without being too hard pressed to keep the grace of God and already haivng sufficient merits for a good place in Heaven.

That doesn't mean, if they were killed, God preferred to killers to chose killing. He just wanted their bad plan to coincide with His purpose for the one who died.

"maybe he should not have allowed a murderer (who he also allowed to kill numerous others without stopping any of those either) to kill her family leaving her with traumatic mental scars for life..."

There is a place where all tears are dried. It is called Heaven.

And not being raised by that father may have been part of how God is planning to get her there.

Answer to three unsolved extinction mysteries : Flood of Noah!

What on Earth Happened to the Neanderthals? (And Other Paleo-Humans)
Masaman | 29.VIII.2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PycSg3ama9A

I

Neanderthals and Denisovans - have you considered the Flood of Noah?

One daughter in law of Noah could have been part Neanderthal, one (same or other, depending on whether Denisovan genes ever alternate with Neanderthal ones) part Denisovan.

II

2:32 "only separated by 60 000 to 100 000 years of evolution, meaning that all people on earth today have a common ancestor from around that time" 2:38 "while foreign Turtles in humans" (for Neanderthals and humans) "the most recent common ancestor stgrecthes back 400 000 to 800 000 years"

2:45 "which goes to show the much greater genetic gap"

I accept the "greater genetic gap". At the Flood, genetic diversity was reduced, no Neanderthal Y-chromosomes, no Neanderthal mitochondria. A daughter in law of Noah as woman lacked Neanderthal or any Y chromosome and as having a Sethite mother (probable Biblical for Cro-Magnon) had Sethite, not Neanderthal mitochondria, and a lot of Sethite rather than Neanderthal in autosomal DNA as well. This means, the Neanderthal heritage after the Flood is reduced in diversity from others.

This does not mean that Neanderthals and Sethites weren't two races, and it does also not mean there were any times like "60 000" or "800 000 years ago".

III

5:35 light skin and red hair are other genes now than in Neanderthals?

As you said "convergent evolution" = not inherited from Neanderthals?

IV

5:51 As I mentioned Flood of Noah, I think "dried up" is a very ironic twist on it ...

V

7:06 "only female hybrids able to have offspring as male hybrids would have been stero" (sterile)

Fairly obviously extrapolated from no Neanderthal Y chromosomes surviving - which is consistent with my already mentioned thesis ... our Neanderthal heritage (what little some of us have) comes via a daughter in law of Noah.

VI

8:03 Recent testing of Atapuerca "Homo Antecessor" showed Antecessors in Atapuerca surprisingly related to Denisovans.

In other words, Denisovan could be synonym to Antecessor and Heidelbergian.

This means both daughters of Noah involved in Neanderthal and Denisovan heritage could be from Spain. Or same one, if we are talking of different chromosomes.

VII

10:20 "who were just as genetically distant from humans as Neanderthals or Denisovans"

Cainites? Ham's wife Noema?

VIII

11:09 "Homo floresiensis believed to have gone extinct 40 to 50 thousand years ago, meaning that similar to Neanderthal and Denisovan ..."

Flood of Noah, again. Extinction of all humans not on the Ark.

Just checked Denisovan, the younger ones that were dated were dated to 30 - 50 ka - i e, compatible with 40 000 BP being the carbon date for Flood of Noah.

Wikipedia : Denisovan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denisovan

Denisova 3 - 30–50 ka
Denisova 4 - 30–50 ka
Denisova 8 - no date shown
Denisova 2 - > 100 ka
Denisova 11 - ~90 ka

PS

Faulty sub Titan (subtitling) is shown to illustrate vanity of concept of AI.

Subtitling software does not understand what is spoken.

Answers to "10 Unsolved Mysteries of the Bible"

Here is the video:

10 Unsolved Mysteries of the Bible
Alltime10s | 17.IX.2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fdwq-kqhCo

Come on, don't snicker! Show some respect to a video which has 4 873 982 views!

This time, I do the answers on this post first, then link to it under the video in a short comment, seeing if it will provoke debate./HGL

• 10) There is an intriguing theory among some Bible scholars that the garden of Eden could have existed in real life ...
  
  That is like saying "there is an intriguing theory among some Bible scholars that Jesus really rose from the dead" ...
  
  No, not an unsolved mystery.
  
  It is perhaps an unsolved mystery where it was, and whether Earthly Paradise survived the Flood in any fashion. Probably it did by being taken up into space. Elflands like Avalon are also kind of an at least second rate option.
  
  
• 9) "have since then inexplicably disappeared from the pages of the Bible and history"
  
  No, Tobit might well have been from after deportation and Iraqi Christians to this day would normally descend in part, but not in their entirety, from the Ten Tribes and in other part from Assyrians.
  
  
• 8) Behemoth : a certain type of dino, namely sauropod, has sufficient similarities to both elephants and hippos to cause those other historical identifications.
  
  Unicorns (a mythological creature) : the horns of a young or small species Ceratopsian are mainly one horn on the nose.
  
  
• 7) When will the Apocalypse happen?
  
  Probably refers not to all of the text of the Apocalypse, some has been ongoing for 2000 years, but probably refers to the "scary stuff".
  
  Probably at a time when many think it won't happen, because prophecy doesn't happen - or so they think.
  
  Probably also a time when there is a unique chance of someone getting a name:
  
  
  • so that parents then do NOT know it adds up to 666
  • so that when he grows up and comes to power, many DO know (or only by wilful choice refuse to know) it so adds up.
  
  
  Now, we certainly live in a time when many think Christianity is bogus and we also live in a time when people are still alive who were born before ASCII, and whose names now that ASCII exists do add up to 666.
  
  So, "in our time" is at least a fairly fair guess.
  
  "For example, in the year 1000, Christian armies waged wars against various Pagan countries, killing thousands in order to forcibly convert people to Christianity before the day of Judgement"
  
  Let's have a look at English wikipedia on 1000, Christendom, for potential or even actual wars:
  
  

  In continental Europe, the Holy Roman Empire established itself as the most powerful state. Otto III made a pilgrimage from Rome to Aachen and Gniezno (Gnesen), stopping at Regensburg, Meissen, Magdeburg, and Gniezno. The Congress of Gniezno (with Bolesław I Chrobry) was part of his pilgrimage. In Rome, he built the basilica of San Bartolomeo all'Isola, to host the relics of St. Bartholomew.
  
  In France, Robert II, the son of Hugh Capet, was the first of the Capetian kings.
  
  The Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty was engaged in a long and hard war with the First Bulgarian Empire. In the year 1000, the Byzantine generals Theodorokanos and Nikephoros Xiphias captured the former Bulgarian capitals of Pliska and Great Preslav, along with Little Preslav, extending Byzantine control over the northeastern portion of the Bulgarian state (Mysia and Scythia Minor). At the same time, Byzantium was instrumental in the Christianization of the Kievan Rus' and of other medieval Slavic states.
  
  In Great Britain, a unified Kingdom of England had developed out of the various Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. In Scandinavia, Christianization was in its early stages, with the Althingi of the Icelandic Commonwealth embracing Christianity in the year 1000.
  
  On September 9, King Olaf Tryggvason was defeated by an alliance of his enemies in the Battle of Svolder. Sweyn I established Danish control over part of Norway. Oslo, Norway, was founded (the exact year is debatable, but the 1,000 year anniversary was held in the year 2000).
  
  ...
  
  Hungary was established in 1000 as a Christian state. In the next centuries, the Kingdom of Hungary became the pre-eminent cultural power in the Central European region. On December 25, Stephen I was crowned as the first King of Hungary in Esztergom.
  
  Sancho III of Navarre became King of Aragon and Navarre. The Reconquista was gaining some ground, but the southern Iberian peninsula would still be dominated by Islam for centuries to come; Córdoba at this time was the world's largest city with 450,000 inhabitants.

  
  
  Holy Roman Empire? No war.
  
  France? No War.
  
  Byzantine Empire? War against Bulgaria - more precisely First Bulgarian Empire - which had a Christian Church since more than a Century.
  
  England? No war against Pagans that year.
  
  Hungary? There may have been internal battles about accepting Christianity or not, as was the case with King Olaf Tryggvason. It's unclear whether the victorious Sweyn was simply a Pagan or preferred missionaries from somewhere else than where Adam of Bremen was later describing him as Pagan. Olaf was however clearly a Christian, and he and his were the side that got butchered.
  
  Reconquista? Yes, war, and against Pagans, if you count Muslims and Idolaters together as Pagans. But this was not to forcibly convert Muslims, it was to free Christians from Muslim domination.
  
  So, no, the description is simply false. You may have confused with First Crusade, but they started later than 1000.
  
  
• 6) When was Jesus born?
  
  It hasn't occurred that "secular" as in non-Christian sources (the only ones in conflict with Gospels) for the time back then are so scarce that one cannot confidently claim that the census was over a decade after Herod died?
  
  For 1000 the source material is richer than for 1000 years earlier, and even for AD 1000 we cannot be sure whether Sweyn was a Pagan or whether he just preferred English Catholic priests over North German Catholic priests. His father had been baptised, but he could have rebelled to get support from Pagan reactionaries - or Adam of Bremen could have described him as Pagan because he thought a real Christian in Denmark would get North German Catholic priests (this is back when England and North Germany were still Catholic, btw).
  
  Or, as has also been suggested, the census to all the world would have been one of loyalty, not of monetary possessions, and therefore distinct from the one occurring (according to a modern reading of Pagan sources from probably a century later, unless Velleius Paterculus uniquely mentions it just decades after it happened) "a decade later".
  
  "This date was popularized as 'Christmas' over 300 years after his death..."
  
  Christians in Egypt had been celebrating it earlier. And as the Holy Family had been in Egypt, some of them would have been in a position to know.
  
  "... potentially to tie in with Winter Solstice festivities."
  
  There weren't any exactly such. Saturnalia were before December 25, Sol Invictus was promoted by an Emperor well after Christians were around (and so it could have been to compete against Christmas), and we cannot know it was popular - or not popular - with total certainty. On balance, probably not, or only fleetingly so.
  
  
• 5) "At least 17 books have mysteriously disappeared from our modern Bibles, and no one knows what happened to them"
  
  We do. Ten were never core Bible books among all Christians (Ascension of Isaiah, IV Maccabees, Ethiopian Henoch, II, III and IV Baruch ...) and seven were taken out at Reformation or later by Protestants, as they are equally missing from the Jewish Bible or OT.
  
  As to the books mentioned in I Chronicles 29:29 ...
  
  Now the acts of king David first and last are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the book of Gad the seer:
  
  I would say, these books are not so much missing as "wiki-ised" - contributions of Samuel, Nathan and Gad being conflated into one text, both in Kings and in Chronicles.
  
  Or Chronicles states its sources here, the contribution of sources in Kings could have been different, except probably including all the text of Samuel (II Kings is also called II Samuel).
  
  
• 4) Was Jesus Married?
  
  Ordinary sense of the word : no. His bride is the Church.
  
  However, he died without fathering children, and when that happens, in Israel, "His brother" was supposed to take over His widow and first son would be his. If He did not have a wife, I find it possible a fiancée or some woman close to Him in friendship could have been designated as "His widow".
  
  "which forensic analysis concluded did indeed date back to Biblical times"
  
  I looked up wiki:
  
  Gospel of Jesus' Wife
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Jesus%27_Wife
  
  

  The Gospel of Jesus' Wife is a papyrus fragment with Coptic text that includes the words, "Jesus said to them, 'my wife...'". The text received widespread attention when first publicized in 2012 for the implication that some early Christians believed that Jesus was married.
  
  The fragment was first presented by Harvard Divinity School Professor Karen L. King,[1][2][3] who suggested that the papyrus contained a fourth-century Coptic translation of a gospel likely composed in Greek in the late second century.[4] Following an investigative Atlantic article by Ariel Sabar published online in June 2016,[5] King conceded that the evidence now "presses in the direction of forgery."[6]
  
  Radiocarbon dating determined that the papyrus is medieval, and further analysis of the language led most scholars to conclude it was copied from the Gospel of Thomas.[7] The fragment's provenance and similarity to another fragment from the same anonymous owner widely believed to be fake further supported a consensus among scholars that the text is a modern forgery written on a scrap of medieval papyrus.[7]

  
  
  Since this last information is most important, look up note seven:
  
  Joel Baden and Candida Moss (December 2014). "The Curious Case of Jesus's Wife". The Atlantic.
  https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/12/the-curious-case-of-jesuss-wife/382227/?single_page=true
  
  Actually, it seems that a dialect of Coptic (Lycopolitan, to those which this means anything to) had been written on another manuscript involving Gospel of St John. The manuscript was dated to when no more manuscripts of Lycopolitan are from and also, the manuscript featured an impossible coincidence with but very possible dependence on an edition from 1924.
  
  And this other manuscript came from the same collection ... which had not been made by a professional in the first place. It is in the article referred to as the Laukamp cache.
  
  Hence, the papyri could clearly be old and yet the text young.
  
  
• 3) Jesus's missing years?
  
  No, it is not a mystery, He was doing carpentry.
  
  And He was doing it in Nazareth in Galilaea. Perhaps He visited some relative doing fishing, since He had no trouble being a partner (somewhat) in the fishing business of His disciples.
  
  It's not even said He helped to empty the nets, so it's possible He was only carpenter and the fishermen among His disciples wanted Him to leave the fishing to them.
  
  Visiting Japan based on "documents lost in WW-II" sounds like we could be dealing with lost attempts of Hirohito to discredit Christianity. Visiting Britain is somewhat less unlikely, if Joseph of Arimathea had a possession there and if he had been one of the men admiring Him in the temple. Also, His deposing the Grail there sounds more like post-Resurrection than years 12 to 30.
  
  
• 2) Lost City of Ophir
  
  Yes, the exact location could be a mystery, however, I might want to ask Damien Mackey on this one ...
  
  
• 1) Where is the Ark of the Covenant?
  
  I don't really know. That could be a real mystery.

Where "Lutheran Satire" Misses a Nuance on Where Rome Is (eternal vs present)

Mohammed and Joseph Smith Revisited · Lutheran Satire Gave the Word to Luther · ... on Luther and Swedish Reformation · Where "Lutheran Satire" Misses a Nuance on Where Rome Is (eternal vs present)

The Two Faces of Rome
LutheranSatire | 10.VII.2011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feHTWSl4GJI

I

1:24 Let's put it like this, if you don't like the Robber Baron of theology (you know who I mean!) there are Roman Catholics who don't consider him a Roman Catholic Bishop.

Like, ask around in Topeka ... you'll find the Pope who doesn't recognise his apostolic mission as a bishop (or at least one of them).

As for the "Popes" who do ...

B 66 060 06
E 69 120 15
N 78 190 23
E 69 250 32
D 68 310 40
E 69 370 49
T 84 450 53
T 84 530 57
O 79 600 66

Now, you check out Bergoglio, upper case as in BERGOGLIO, and ASCII ...

II

2:29 Actually, the bishop consecrating Pope Michael, if not Pope Michael himself, seems to have some Norwegian heritage.

Bob / Robert Biarnesen ... I think Bjarnesen sounds fairly Norwegian.

David Bawden by family background hails from the mission ground of Sts Cyril and Method (Moravia).

III

A, his description of video:

It's a predicament. I love me some Roman Catholic lay people. And I hate me some whacky Gospel denying Popery.

For citations of these teachings of the RCC, and a bit of commentary, check out my blog post:

The High Mid Life : The Two Faces of Rome : Director's Commantary
http://thehighmidlife.blogspot.com/2011/07/two-faces-of-rome-directors-commentary.html

B, my comment on that:

"For citations of these teachings of the RCC, and a bit of commentary, check out my blog post"

It so happens, I have here trouble seeing it, it quickly redirects to something else.

I used a webcite to stabilise the post.

Evolution : you are citing Antipopes Wojtyla and Ratzinger.
Higher Criticism : you are citing Antipopes Wojtyla and Ratzinger.

I guess why Parisians don't like my position, they are afraid that "Place Jean XXIII" and "Place Jean-Paul II" where it says "Pape" might be tagged with a NON- prior to "Pape" ...

Trent - yes, in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will

If you think you can be justified while still wanting to murder someone or not wanting to quit porn, you are anathema, sir!

Last item : nothing in Trent or then hierarchy (Pope St Pius V inter alia and the totality or near totality of bishops in communion with him) is against the Bible, and the guys who want you to believe the monopoly is with the hierarchies of Wojtyla, Ratzinger or Bergoglio first would need to deal with the doubt that they might not be continuing the Trentine one, then there is a problem in how they cite Trent.

Trent actually says "the Church" which very definitely involves all hierarchies of the past, while the formulation taken from the un-Catholic CCC seems to imply it resides at present with only the hierarchs presently alive.

I rejected CCC as un-Catholic after seeing how Ratzinger under Wojtyla dealt with the Thomistic proofs for God.

Evil redirect:

Solution:

WebCite® archiving request processed

Thank you for your submission. Your request to archive the content of

http://thehighmidlife.blogspot.com/2011/07/two-faces-of-rome-directors-commentary.html

has been entered into the archival queue. An archive of this page should shortly be available at

http://www.webcitation.org/71z1pLWx4

... on Luther and Swedish Reformation

Mohammed and Joseph Smith Revisited · Lutheran Satire Gave the Word to Luther · ... on Luther and Swedish Reformation · Where "Lutheran Satire" Misses a Nuance on Where Rome Is (eternal vs present)

Here is a video you have already seen on this blog and a comment of mine under it, which also you have already seen, followed by some recent exchange you have not yet seen over here:

A Latter Day Re-Gift
LutheranSatire | 26.VIII.2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7bukaRhbI0

Hans-Georg Lundahl

This is a point for a Lutheran to ponder:

"Reestablishing the one true religion"

What did Luther think he was doing?

The Prayer Army

Luther wasn't searching for the one true religion. He believed in Catholicism, but wanted to reform the Catholic church to reject unbiblical doctrine and follow the Gospel only. Abolishing relics, unbiblical rituals, and superstition. And making the scriptures available to people in their own language so they they could read the Bible for themselves so that they didn't have to blindly take the Church's word for everything. The Catholic church capitalised on biblical illiteracy to exploit the public. Martin was simply trying to bring the corruption to an end, but the Papists love their corruption so they excommunicated him and thus the Protestant reformation was born.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"He believed in Catholicism, but wanted to reform the Catholic church to reject unbiblical doctrine and follow the Gospel only."

You just contradicted yourself.

Believing in Catholicism and rejecting its doctrine as "unbiblical" (a word where connotations like extra-biblical and anti-biblical are sorely confused) are opposed to each other. You could have said "he believed in Catholicism but wanted to reform the Church by rejecting Catholicism" or "he believed in unbiblical doctrine, but wanted to reform the Church by rejecting unbiblical doctrine". The former from a Catholic, the second from a really Protestant p o v.

"Abolishing relics,"

Contrary to:

"And some that were burying a man, saw the rovers, and cast the body into the sepulchre of Eliseus. And when it had touched the bones of Eliseus, the man came to life, and stood upon his feet."
[4 Kings (2 Kings) 13:21]

Contrary to:

"When she had heard of Jesus, came in the crowd behind him, and touched his garment."
[Mark 5:27]

Contrary to:

"So that even there were brought from his body to the sick, handkerchiefs and aprons, and the diseases departed from them, and the wicked spirits went out of them."
[Acts Of Apostles 19:12]

"unbiblical rituals,"

Which extra-biblical rituals are anti-biblical?

"and superstition."

Where in a seamless garment do you cut up "this is faith" and "this is superstition" if you believe Catholicism?

"And making the scriptures available to people in their own language"

Already done more than once, even in German.

"so they they could read the Bible for themselves"

Not very realistic in a society where few had money to buy books and leisure to read. You confuse Luther with the Gideonites.

"so that they didn't have to blindly take the Church's word for everything."

Contrary to :

"But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth."
[1 Timothy 3:15]

If the Church is the pillar and ground of the truth, we MUST take its word for everything. Note, with due diligence a to what is more or what is less likely to be the Church's word, rather than the personal opinion of a Church man. Suppose "John Paul II" had been pope in 1992, even so telling a few scientists nearly in private "Evolution is more than [just] a theory" does NOT trump Trent dogmatising that the Bible must be read according to the Church Fathers (none of whom were evolutionists, all of whom took the creation of each thing except Earth as clearly non-gradual, unless you consider the lapse of some hours between Adam's and Eve's creation as man being "gradually" created).

"The Catholic church capitalised on biblical illiteracy"

No.

Reformers capitalised in biblical illiteracy to be able to pretend being those bringing Biblical literacy to laymen.

"to exploit the public"

Let's see the exact effect of Reformation in Sweden as to Church "exploiting" the public.

• 1) Monasteries and churches had land given back to nobles (well, they were laymen, but hardly the mass of the public) and silver taken first time over to the crown (which while certainly involving laymen was hardly the public);
• 2) cereal tithes had in most dioceses been divided as : 1/3 to parish priest, 2/9 to the bishop, 2/9 to the Church, 2/9 to the poor, at [R]eformation the tithing was reformed to divide as : 1/3 to parish priest, 2/3 to the crown. Before and after it was 10 % of cereals. Non-cereal tithes were 100 % to the parish priest, also 10 % of each revenue;
• 3) Church was discouraged from appealing to generosity. Including for the poor.

"Martin was simply trying to bring the corruption to an end, but the Papists love their corruption so they excommunicated him and thus the Protestant reformation was born."

None of the things you enumerated were both corrupt and true about the Catholic Church.

Lisa Haven recalls Mao Zedong and watches Nursultan

Satanic Dictator Rises From the Shadows & You Won’t Believe the New World Order City He’s Building
Lisa Haven | 30.IV.2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdZ07OS7AAk

Atbash cipher:

A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M
Z	Y	X	W	V	U	T	S	R	Q	P	O	N

Albam cipher:

A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M
N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W	X	Y	Z

Comment

No very obvious connection to 666 in ASCII, starting with MAOZEDONG and NURSULTAN as these names have 9 letters.

M	77	070	07		N	78	070	08
A	65	130	12		U	85	150	13
O	79	200	21		R	82	230	15
Z	90	290	21		S	83	310	18
E	69	350	30		U	85	390	23
D	68	410	38		L	76	460	29
O	79	480	47		T	84	520	33
N	78	550	55		A	65	580	38
G	71	620	56		N	78	650	46

MAOZEDONG 676
NURSULTAN 696

N	78	070	08		Á	1	93	190	03
A	65	130	13		B		66	250	09
Z	90	220	13		I		73	320	12
A	65	280	18		S		83	400	15
R	82	360	20		H		72	470	17
B	66	420	26		U		85	550	22
A	65	480	31		L		76	620	28
Y	89	560	40		Y		89	700	37
E	69	620	49
V	86	700	55

NAZARBAYEV 755
ÁBISHULY 737

0755
0737
0696
2188 : 3 = 729
216
0028
0027
0001 / 3

Interestingly, he has a medium of nine letters per each name, and the medium of the names is 729. And a third.

Now, 729 is what you get in ASCII on nine letters of English alphabet, such that, if exchanged in Atbash cipher, they would add up to 666. However, you can hardly fit in Á in an Atbash cipher going from A to Z. 193 is 103 above Z, how do you get anything 103 below 65?

Now, in ASCII, two people stand out.

BERGOGLIO = 666 (he could change spelling to Borgoglio, new spelling of city the family is from 676 instead in block letters)
JORGEMARIO Albam cipher WBETRZNEVB = 777
JMBERGOGLIO Atbash cipher QNYVITLTORL = 888
(Greek Gematria for IHCOYC, and he is a Jesuit)

Here is the other guy, all straight, no Albam or Atbash:

WLADIMIRA = 666 (Genitive and Accusativ of WLADIMIR)
VLADIMIRB = 666 (read as Vladimir B = Vladimir II, both in family and in Russia)
V POUTINE = 666

And one Atbash for him too:

VPUTIN in Atbash EKFGRM = 444, which is why I once took him for "King of the South" (straight for 444 = SALMAN who would be a better candidate).

Without that space, VPOUTINE is 634 = KOMUNYST = USURARIO (Polish for Commie, Spanish for Usurer or abusive money-lender).

Not sure you can get as many matches for Prince Harry in Hebrew, I actually checked all the matches I could recall and didn't get any of them ... to match 666, that is.

(Atbash already explained, in Hebrew that would be aleph~tau, beth~shin, in English A~Z, B~Y, as to Albam it would be aleph~lamed, beth~mem, in English alphabeth it's A~N, B~O).

Excuses

to those who saw the first few seconds of the publication, the tables for the ASCII values needed to be fixed by adding the <tr> tag. Also needed to make the ciphers into tables, not each just two strings of block letters, to secure correct matchup.

... on Misdefining Paedophilia, bis

Is Your Virginity Something Special?
Jenn | 21.VI.2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sf3P6cLiIWs

I

0:56 I am reminded a bit of Alexandra Kollontai ... "having sex is like drinking a glass of water" (as in no more special than that) "to me" ...

II

1:26 "a way to keep kids from having sex"

Kids don't usually tend to enjoy sex. They prefer chocolate (in tablets and in cups), mint, marshmallows, stories not involving sex or not involving sex described in detail.

You meant children, right?

III

1:53 If he didn't use a condom and you didn't use a pill, it could very well have been lifechanging. Your bad luck if it wasn't, if so.

[In other words, she is misusing language, she is not talking of children.]

IV

3:03 I don't think most girls or boys of 9, 10, 11 have ANY pressure to have sex. I hope they don't.

V

If you mentioned "outdated" you implied "old times".

I think by kids you might have meant not actual children, but young adults, essentially teens.

You know, a boy from 14 + some months (with a normal variation one year either way), or a girl from 12 + some months (dito) can have sex and can have children. I e, they are not children any more.

Virginity to marriage means, not "wait to 18" in that context, but "wait till you are married". I e, otherwise the gal or guy you end up getting married to can be wounded, you can come to bed with someone else's child in you or in a girl you left, you can come to bed with a disease.

And "to marriage" at least for gals did not mean "to 18".

Take a look at one lineage from St Louis IX to Early Modern Times:

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Mariages entre St Louis IX et Françoise de Rohan : une lignée
http://filolohika.blogspot.com/2018/06/mariages-entre-st-louis-ix-et-francoise.html

VI

This video explains the subject nearly good, but "teen pregnancy" and "adolescent sex" are cited as problem behaviours, presumably irrespectively of marriage or not marriage in studies the priest finds "scientific":

Why is fornication or adultery considered a sin in Christianity?
Coptic Orthodox Answers | 9.XI.2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_e66QhQydw

Obviously, a girl married at 13 cn normally have sex at 13, a girl not married at 20 should not have sex at 20, and dito for the guys ...

Youtuber Jenn attempts to normalise Pedophilia and Hebephilia
Dead Spinster | 4.V.2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VehU7kZwsvw

I

I have just seen one more reason why CSL hated the word "kids".

It's too imprecise as to what age it refers to.

II

7:21 at stats:

62,936 "child" victims

Of these:
1,660 + 8,802 + 10,827 + 11,600 = 32,889
= really unambiguously children (ages 1 or less to 11)

16,560 = children if boys, not if girls (maturity being at lower limit 12 for girls, higher limit 14 for boys)

13,133 + 354 = 13,487 NOT children (ages 14 to 21).

Lets hope Jenn was talking about boys 14 to 21 and girls 12 to 21 ...

Btw, I note the words "reported".

"This report was prepared by the Children’s Bureau (Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Administration for Children and Families) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services."

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm2012.pdf

It does perhaps not detail how many of the reports resulted in convictions in justice?

III

dialogue:

Victoria V

she's been abused at an early age and she's been mind controlled. hopefully she is infertile because she should NEVER have kids or be around them.

Skipping

some of the responses, going down to the one before mine. Before my answer to Victoria V.

kryten4k

BulbasaurUseVinewhip
Islam is rape central for children, it is part if the religion

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"hopefully she is infertile because she should NEVER have kids or be around them."

If you think that, you are heeding doctrines of evil spirits.

[1] Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils, [2] Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience seared, [3] Forbidding to marry, to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful, and by them that have known the truth. [4] For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be rejected that is received with thanksgiving: [5] For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.

First Epistle Of Saint Paul To Timothy : Chapter 4
http://drbo.org/chapter/61004.htm

kryten4k

I so hate religion, it promotes child rape, slavery and murder. Fact is religion isn't needed anymore....let it go

Hans-Georg Lundahl

I am sorry, @kryten4k - I wonder what YOU consider as "child" rape?

If you meant Islam, a nine ye[a]r old girl is of course statistically likely to be still a real child. But in some cases puberty sets in early.

kryten4k

Just because somebody hits puberty it isn't open season on their sexuality, pedophiles are all the same, any excuse to justify their perversion. Basically if you are an adult and have sexual thoughts about children then you are an abomination rather than 'misunderstood', children's minds are seriously screwed up after these pathetic predators have targeted them. The only good thing about this is when they get caught and 'incidentally' get put into mainstream prison only then true justice is carried out. (apart from the cleaning staff that have to clear the mess)

Skipping

another response to Victoria

Hans-Georg Lundahl

I am sorry, but if someone is in normal puberty, that person is no longer a child.

If someone can have children, that someone is not a child, except if the puberty is abnormally early.

And, "perversion" is measured against the standard of normal sex being intended to be fertile.

kryten4k

I am sorry but there is much more involved in classifying an adult. Puberty isn't the deciding factor. Again, it is irreverent since we know pedophiles are perverts trying to find an 'IN' to access children. Perversion is a perfectly valid description when describing an older adult having sexual thoughts about children. Dumbass pedophiles always lose the argument when presented with the question of is it ok to have sex with a 9 year old child... They will go into bullshit arguments about age of consent, puberty, cultural differences, etc but all roads lead back to sick people trying to justify child rape.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"I am sorry but there is much more involved in classifying an adult. Puberty isn't the deciding factor."

NORMAL puberty is, as to the age past childhood which is relavant for marriage.

"Again, it is irreverent since we know pedophiles are perverts trying to find an 'IN' to access children. "

Would be irrelevant if talking about teen marriage in positive terms stamped you as a pedophile and if "pedophilia" were a well defined concept.

"Perversion is a perfectly valid description when describing an older adult having sexual thoughts about children."

Precisely poses the question what is a child.

Two factors are included : the brain development finished at age 12 and the puberty making someone fertile.

In a child of 9 - that's Muslims, not me saying they are licit for marriage - the brain development would be lacking though in exceptional cases puberty is not. (The cases may be less exceptional among Arabs than among Europeans).

kryten4k

The past is for knuckle draging savages....NOT what we want for today's morals and law and order. So by your own words: "a nine yer old girl is of course statistically likely to be still a real child. But in some cases puberty sets in early" do you think is is ok for a 50 year old man to have sex with a 9 year old girl if she had her period?

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"The past is for knuckle draging savages....NOT what we want for today's morals and law and order."

You just disqualified yourself from discussing morals.

"do you think is is ok for a 50 year old man to have sex with a 9 year old girl if she had her period?"

I do not think so, I just said there is also a brain development finishing at 12 (there is another one after 12, but it's not relevant to lifelong sexual consent a k a marriage, since taste is a simple decision).

I am also not a Muslim. Catholicism has had the limit 14 for boys and 12 for girls (brain development + NORMAL puberty, neither precocious nor delayed) for centuries. I will however say, a Muslim thinking it was ok is less disgusting, for instance, than a Talmudic Jew saying a girl of 3 and a half years and a day could be married (historically, not typical, I hope, for today's Jewry in the West). It is also partly exonerated since Mohammed lived in Arabic Peninsula, outside historic limits of Roman and Byzantine civilisation. It's understandable as it would be in a Tibetan foreigner or in a South Sea savage.

[Thought this had not been published, hence my next comment partly repeats ths one.]

kryten4k

I stand by my comments, pedophiles are perverts trying to justify their sick twisted ways and are attempting to gain acceptance when we all know they shouldn't be breathing. Actually it WAS you that mentioned that children could have their period earlier which suggest to me that you somehow have a selective memory about what you state. Children having sex with children is very very very different with a sick 30 year old having sex with a child and you know this. There are cases where children having sex with each other has happened however it is at no point a justification for a pervert with a degraded mind to rape a child. Rape by the way is having sex with an under aged child, I thought you needed to hear that since it is such a confusing point for you. Don't try to muddy the waters, you and I both know it is wrong and I can see through your attempts to normalize sex with young children. I hope some day you and I can 'catch up' because I am tired of perverted predators like yourself waiting for opportunities to sexually gratify yourself at the expense of children's lives. Such a sad pathetic life you live, go seek help before an angry parent finds you. Save yourself while you still can...

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"The past is for knuckle draging savages....NOT what we want for today's morals and law and order."

You just disqualified yourself from discussing morals.

Universally valid morals are unchangeable.

"So by your own words: "a nine yer old girl is of course statistically likely to be still a real child. But in some cases puberty sets in early" do you think is is ok for a 50 year old man to have sex with a 9 year old girl if she had her period?"

50 year old man is irrelevant, she is too young, due to that brain development settling at 12 (there is another later one, which is irrelevant here, since marriage is a question of taste, not experience).

However, I am not a Muslim, the Catholic Church has for centuries had the 14/12 limit. 14 male and 12 female partner of a marriage.

I find it however more excusable than if she had been way under 9 (Aysha, I believe you are referring to) and had not had her period. Also, Arabic Peninsula was a "savage" land outside proper civilisation and learning.

kryten4k

You are a pedophile and therefore you don't get to state who is disqualified, you are the lowest of the lowest which is why you hide behind anonymous text online instead of telling the world what you think in public. Your thinking is precisely savagery which makes my statement qualified since no sane culture allows sex with children and this is a known fact by me and YOU. Again stop trying to dodge reality, sex with children is sick and perverted. Seek help sicko.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"Actually it WAS you that mentioned that children could have their period earlier which suggest to me that you somehow have a selective memory about what you state."

I did not deny stating that.

I did deny a very early period justified a very early marital age, like 9.

The Catholic Church has considered the age limit for "under aged child" to "maritable" at 14 / 12.

I stand by it.

"pedophiles are perverts"

How do YOU define "pedophile"? How do YOU define "pervert"?

"Children having sex with children is very very very different with a sick 30 year old having sex with a child and you know this."

If two people same age actually have sex, NEITHER is a child, and if you don't know it, you should. Two five year olds or two nine year olds can't have sex.

Children cannot get or make pregnant. (Excepting extreme early age).

"Rape by the way is having sex with an under aged child"

In France and Sweden, that is a separate offense from rape.

Rape in France involves taking advantage by violence, threat of violence, surprise.

[Think there was another one too, "incapacity"? but was not sure which.]

I happen to be in France, not US.

So, I am very sorry, but your present day US age limits for underage and your present day US definition of rape, btw varying from state to state at least as to underage, is NOT a universal.

As you started to call me confused for not treating it as such, I think YOU are culturally confused and needed to hear that.

"I can see through your attempts to normalize sex with young children."

I am NOT trying to normalise "sex" with with children, let alone young such, as in babies or toddlers. I am promoting the old and reasonable age limit - as opposed to the modern and idiotic one.

YOUR age limits have resulted in so many fornications leading to abortion rather than marriage.

Now sex with young adults (as in teens and twenties) is quite another matter.

"I am tired of perverted predators like yourself waiting for opportunities to sexually gratify yourself at the expense of children's lives."

Get a clue.

I am trying to get married and I am not discriminating against young adults above 18.

Parents like you have however (btw, are you an overhysteric parent?) muddied the waters about me, and spread evil rumours - leading to some disruptions of my plans to get married, more than once. AND you can of course exploit that to pretend I am waiting to exploit the next child who is really a child.

"when we all know they shouldn't be breathing."

Are you SERIOUSLY putting desire for a teen on par with desire for a toddler?

And as you said a teen having sex with a teen is no big deal, how many teen boys today have a possibility to be a breadwinner for the teen girl and her baby? More like the 30 year old man could be so ... right?

But perhaps you are a butcher of babies as well as of men and you would prefer abortion, if a teen gets pregnant?

kryten4k

The reason why you are having trouble with “evil rumours “ is because you have been found out and now you’re on the sex offender register, the things you do in life catch up to you. Since you stated so many dumb things I don’t care enough to address them all but you and I know who you are and I can tell by the way you try to normalise pedophilia that you’re a pervert And should never go near children or schools. Get help and stop trying to defend pedophiles with bullshit.

Evolved Love

kryten4k thank you

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"The reason why you are having trouble with “evil rumours “ is because you have been found out and now you’re on the sex offender register, the things you do in life catch up to you."

Oh, am I?

No. I have been in prison, for quite another thing - defending myself against a police trying to bring me to a shrink - and after I came out parts of the backstory, which would NOT have sufficed to put me on such a thing, were distorted into my being in prison for a sex offense, which is not true.

So, no, if you can't show a sex offender register where the name Hans Georg Lundahl is on it, you shut up with insults and calumny!

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@Evolved Love - are you thanking kryten4k for being a jerk to me?

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"Since you stated so many dumb things I don’t care enough to address them all but you and I know who you are and I can tell by the way you try to normalise pedophilia that you’re a pervert"

Oh, you can tell by that - and not by seeing me on a sex offender register as you claimed I was ...

In other words, you try to dumb down the debate by accusing everyone disagreeing with you.

kryten4k

Hans-Georg Lundahl
I’m afraid I just don’t believe you, first you defend pedophiles and attempt to down play sex with children as somewhat normal then you say you have done time for ‘defending yourself from the police ‘, how on Earth can you be trusted as a moral or stable source of information? Are you that brain damaged that you think it’s a good idea to front up to the cops with aggression, what the hell is wrong with you? You need a wake up call, you are on the wrong side somehow because that is way too much drama in your life without you somehow contributing to it! Grow the fuck up man an have some sensitivity for the children that have had their lives ruined by these monsters...and yet you actually defend this scum. Wake up!

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"I’m afraid I just don’t believe you,"

You might want to learn to read calmly before you do.

"first you defend pedophiles"

No.

"and attempt to down play sex with children as somewhat normal"

I do downplay sex within precocious and invalid marriaged to precociously early puberty cases COMPARED TO real sex with obvious in any way or mode children, like toddlers. If the buzz word "pedophilia" has made you think these two are the same thing - think again (even if it is hard for you).

My main point though was to defend heterosexual hebephilia, and the centuries long valid Catholic age limits.

"then you say you have done time for ‘defending yourself from the police ‘,"

Yes, from 1998 to 2000.

"how on Earth can you be trusted as a moral or stable source of information?"

Perhaps a hysteric like you can't.

"Are you that brain damaged that you think it’s a good idea to front up to the cops with aggression, what the hell is wrong with you?"

There are situations in which it is a licit thing. And waiting till they and shrinks ruined my life by my not defending myself would not have been advantageous, as far as I can see.

"You need a wake up call,"

That's what the police and some others might have thought too ...

"you are on the wrong side somehow because that is way too much drama in your life without you somehow contributing to it!"

Contributing is one thing, contributing proportionately to the hysteria some have built up around me is another thing.

"Grow the fuck up man an have some sensitivity for the children that have had their lives ruined by these monsters"

In case a real child has had his or her life really ruined by a real monster willing to prey on (using the word cautiously) actual children, why would you believe I do not have sensitivity?

Perhaps it's you who lack it, since you have none for teens having their lives ruined by abortions and late marital ages after a pregnancy, which could otherwise have led to a fairly normal life.

Note, extremely well, a teen who gets pregnant is NOT a child.

"and yet you actually defend this scum. Wake up!"

Get a cup of coffee, and read what I wrote once again, in context.

Here is the link (under second video, III):

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : ... on Misdefining Paedophilia, bis
http://assortedretorts.blogspot.com/2018/08/on-misdefining-paedophilia-bis.html

IV

also dialogue, if a short one.

It's NOW Or NEVER

I was molested at 6 years old. I'm in my mid 30's now and still till this day it has caused me great stress. Anxiety. Anger issues. Anger more so in teen years and early 20's. Drug use. There's a reason 75% of opiate addicts report sexual abuse as children. Hmmm wonder why. Dope kills pain. Abd molested children have a lot. And my case wasn't as bad as some people's. But never the less it left a mark on me I've had to carry through life. Even though I stopped blaming myself and at peace with it. Damage had been done.

Skipping

some of the responses, going down mine.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"I was molested at 6 years old."

Are you anywhere near sure Jenn was talking about 6 year olds when saying "kids"?

I hope she was not.

Some, like kryzen4k seem to use both "kids" and even children of teens after puberty set in if they are just underage.

... on Genesis as History

These guys aren't always right, but very often:

Is Genesis poetry? (Creation Magazine LIVE! 7-05)
CMIcreationstation | 28.II.2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7FFt81bk88

Intro

Mainly agreed, my comments are a few side points, except last where disagreeing with esp. post-Flood patriarchs between Flood and Abraham cited as per Masoretic.

I

8:57 If you agree on long age, you probably also agree on dating, including carbon dating.

And since Abraham at age just after 75 in Genesis 13 and 14 line up with a very clearly proto-dynastic Egypt and Chalcolithic En-Gedi (thanks, Osgood!), that would date by contemporary carbon dates Abraham to c. 3000 BC, somewhat earlier if the Pharao of Genesis 13 was Narmer, while the Biblical chronology up to Joseph and Exodus and King David and so one seem set for more like 2000 BC (Roman Martyrology, LXX based, short stay in Egypt, shorter post-Flood patriarchs than standard LXX, has Abraham born in 2015 BC, so Genesis 12 would have been in 1940 BC).

The solution would seem to be, carbon 14 in Abraham's atmosphere was lower, about as now the samples from Carolingian times.

II

14:55 "historical overview followed by a recap"

In Apocalypse 19 and 20 we would be seeing the opposite sequence.

19 gives details from end of the world, 20 places it in Church history.

Some, however, would place the "thousand years" in 20 between 19 and end of 20.

III

20:58 I actually think Genesis is the first history overview in the world.

Maybe Gilgamesh or Atrahasis or Job were perhaps a century older than Moses writing Genesis. (Moses could have got Job from Raguel/Jethro).

Maybe Mahabharata was about that time (not probable, but possible).

But these are all accounts of single event clusters in the past (for pagan writings) or written down by participant (for Job), and none of them has detailed narratives spanning three centuries or more.

Genesis spans three millennia.

IV

21:39 I checked exactitude with a more modern example.

Correspondence of Hans Georg Lundahl : âge du monde avec Gabriel Audisio
http://correspondentia-ioannis-georgii.blogspot.com/2017/06/age-du-monde-avec-gabriel-audisio.html

The following not from the comment with link, but from the link, translation to the right:
Henri engendra Louis dans la 48-ème année de sa vie, après il vécut presque neuf ans, tous les ans de la vie d'Henri étaient 57 et même un peu moins. Louis engendra Louis dans la 37-ème année de sa vie, après il vécut presque cinq ans, tous les ans de la vie de Louis étaient 42 et même un peu moins. Louis engendra Louis dans la 24-ème année de sa vie, après il vécut presque 54 ans, tous les ans de la vie de Louis étaient 77 ans et même un peu moins. Louis engendra Louis dans la 21-ème année de sa vie, après il vécut presque 29 ans, tous les ans de la vie de Louis étaient de 50 ans et même un peu moins. Louis engendra Louis dans la 29-ème année de sa vie, après il vécut deux ans, tous les ans de la vie de Louis étaient de 30 ans et même un peu moins. Louis engendra Louis dans la 20-ème année de sa vie, après il vécut presque 45 ans, tous les ans de la vie de Louis étaient 65 ans et même un peu moins. Louis engendra Louis dans la 35-ème année de sa vie, après il vécut onze ans et un peu plus, tous les ans de la vie de Louis étaient 46 ans et un peu plus. Louis engendra Louis dans la 31-ème année de sa vie, et il vit la prise de la Bastille dans la 35-ème année de sa vie. Entre la naissance d'Henri IV et la prise de la Bastille, faut-il prendre: A : 57 + 42 + 77 + 50 + 30 + 65 + 46 + 35 = 402 ans? B : 48 + 37 + 24 + 21 + 29 + 20 + 35 + 35 = 249 ans? 1789 - 1553 = 236 ans.		Henry begot Louis in the 48th year of his life, after he lived almost nine years, all the years of Henri's life were 57 and even a little less. Louis begot Louis in the 37th year of his life, after he lived almost five years, all the years of Louis's life were 42 and even a little less. Louis begot Louis in the 24th year of his life, after he lived almost 54 years, all the years of Louis's life were 77 years old and even a little less. Louis fathered Louis in the 21st year of his life, after he lived almost 29 years, all the years of life of Louis were 50 years old and even a little less. Louis fathered Louis in the 29th year of his life, after he lived two years, all the years of life of Louis were 30 years old and even a little less. Louis begot Louis in the 20-th year of his life, after he lived almost 45 years, all the years of Louis's life were 65 years old and even a little less. Louis fathered Louis in the 35th year of his life, after he lived eleven years and a little more, all the years of life of Louis were 46 years old and a little more. Louis begot Louis in the 31st year of his life, and he saw the capture of the Bastille in the 35th year of his life. Between the birth of Henri IV and the taking of the Bastille, must we take: A: 57 + 42 + 77 + 50 + 30 + 65 + 46 + 35 = 402 years? B: 48 + 37 + 24 + 21 + 29 + 20 + 35 + 35 = 249 years? 1789 - 1553 = 236 years old.
Did you spot an error in the translation? This is an update two days later, btw. I did, despite very short and formulaic sentences : "après" is translated as the preposition "after" instead of as the adverb "thereafter" or the adverbial phrase "after that" - which is what the context requires. Oh, btw, I did it by Google translate, not by hand. Also, last "236 ans" is not the age of anyone, so "236 years old" is another mistake by that machine. So much for AI!

This when Gabriel Audisio had been adding total lifespans (Adam's 930 + Seth's ... etc).

21:51 "Flood to Abraham 353 years"

Masoretic text was tampered with here, in order to pretend that Melchisedec could be Seth, ancestor of Levi, rather than a Gentile.

In Josephus, you find an addition (not from Bible text) as 353 or sth, but you find the detailed genealogy as in LXX (or one of its versions).

He had learned the LXX version by heart as Bible, but been told about the new sum of the years in synagogue, no doubt. To me, at least.

21:58 Christian scholars previous to Reformation, previous to Ussher calculated more like Creation sth like 5199 or 5500 or 5509 years BC.

The Catholic Church doesn't condemn the Ussher calculation, which agrees with Vulgate, but in Christmas litergy uses a 5199 distance from Creation to Christ.

David Woods on Islam

Fairly good, but I think I have some pieces to add to the puzzle ... (btw, when my comments include a time signature, they refer to what part of video I comment on, as usual). His video:

Whitewashing Islam: 20 Errors on 20/20 (ABC News)
Acts17Apologetics | 17.XI.2011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZ5Bwj3iTrg

My comments:

I

As to error #1, how do you like this indirect piece of reporting:

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Trousers
http://filolohika.blogspot.com/2018/08/trousers.html

II

Would you agree that the guys you talk about [the ones ABC found representative] are the kind of guys you might hear a thing from like "I believe in the Qoran to 90 %"?

I was in prison with one who did. He and some salafim of his arranged so I got displaced to a mental ward, rather than that dangerous criminal ward.

Now "le Coran" = 740. What is 90 % of that?

Oh, in ASCII - A to Z = 65 - 90, each small letter is 32 more and space is also 32 in ASCII.

III

11:51 When I was in Austrian school, I did hear of offensive Jihad.

Vienna 1529 and Vienna 1683.

Sure, leaving Muslims left nice things behind, like coffee, but I think the Viennese enjoyed the coffee a bit more without the Muslim company ...

IV

Have you read The Flying Inn by Chesterton?

A really good book, a certain Misysra Ammon would give you a good chuckle!

Chesterton wrote about that Muslim interviewed for ABC in decades in advance.

V

15:48 Btw, if by "drugged monkey" you were thinking of me (I didn't do time for a drug offense, the Muss did partially for drug dealing), you might as well bow down five times to Meccah, they spread that kind of thing after I came out of prison ... more alcohol, actually, but they don't see me with great quantites of beer, so they may have changed story to drugs, now.

Including, perhaps, those of them who are in French police ...

Sorry, saw the video is from 2011 ...

VI

18:18 Could bringing lots of sugary things to a man in the risk zone of diabetes and with a sugar tooth be a kind of taqqiya?

It happens they call me "my friend", I usually don't reply - to those words.

VII

19:52 "do women get to beat their husbands into submission?"

In Vienna, yes. (Perhaps not in 1529 or 1683, when men were fighting Muslims ...)

Ah, "in the Qoran" - not where Vienna got its mores from ....

VIII

22:27 My point about Afghanistan presence.

Under Bush, there was some sense of protecting Christian converts there, it got lost under Obama. West has supported a moderate Muss who threw Christians in prison instead of beheading them and forbade sales of the Bible in Kabul ....

Perhaps bc moderate Muslims are "in our first line of defense" ...

IX

23:40 I can show it you for him ... you just mentioned taqiyya.

In prison, the four Muslims at the table protected me from the four Muslims at the table, claiming I had been suicidal to tell them:

• Qoran is not God's word;
• Qoran is the devil's word.

After prison, I added, "so is ..." (Talmud, Book of Mormon, Martin Luther's theses) .... can you guess why? Apart from it being true, too ...

X

25:03 I wonder if Islam is really the only subject they don't lose credibility by bad research on, or it could be the one you notice ....

Bashing Catholics can be another one ... and Middle Ages ...

Medieval Cleanliness

How clean were Medieval people?
Simple History | 23.IV.2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue6KrclRvY8

Comment on their final word on cesspits:

Cess pits cleaned out actually gave farmers vert desireable fertiliser.

Boulogne-Billancourt, outside Paris, had this system to when Napoleonic Wars depleted the numbers of surrounding vineyard owners, leading to a need for other solutions.

Obviously, if farmers came once evert two weeks or so, the task was not too unthankful.

On Misdefining Paedophilia

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : On Misdefining Paedophilia · New blog on the kid : Gemma tells us of Jeremy - and I reflect.

Not sure this very vague word, describing in my view at least three different things of which only two are immoral, has even one correct definition, but here we deal with a misdefinition:

The Paedophile Agenda
TheFuelProject | 3.VIII.2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8p5ijTfdPM

@4:51 ...

Paedophile teacher Jeremy Forrest who fled to France with pupil, 15, faces being thrown BACK in jail as the girl reveals they were in touch on Facebook after he was freed
By Mark Duell for MailOnline | 1 June 2017 / 2 June 2017
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4562748/Girl-fled-France-Jeremy-Forrest-speaks-out.html

Apart from the false journalism, in which journalist misrepresents Forrest as paedophile, what has this story to do at all with paedophilia?

In France, he was NOT abusing a class room situation. At 15, the girl was no longer a child.

She may have been a minor according to English laws of consent, but she was not a child.

Could she be made pregnant? Yes. Could she bear a child? Yes.

Was she a child? C o n s e q u e n t l y : n o !

Obviously, as long as he and she are not in the same class room, where her affair or (in a normal day) marriage might affect grades by his bias, or where his authority over her in a group might affect her decision to stay or not with him, what is the point of being against it?

The mother of St Francis of Sales was younger (14) when she married his father - who was older than just 34.

This kind of pseudomoralism which would stamp the normal people we descend from as abnormal (in acceptances if not majority of marriages) is why I cannot go behind an appeal like "international fight against paedophilia".

Russian Revolution, like Italian Risorgimento, made marriages below 18 illegal and consequently stamped many as minors who should not be.

And Russian preference for psychiatry over penal system made this Commie nation invent the modern and recent content of the concept of paedophilia, without which this affair could not in a 100 years have been stamped as an affair of "paedophilia".

Fatima Revelation predicted Russia would spread its errors through the world. It is still doing so today.

Quoting someone else on thread "kummer45":

___________

1. Problem with pedophilia. There is no consent on both parts because there are different levels of biological development.
2. Problem with pedophilia. The whole thing is an imposition instead of a choice.
3. Problem with pedophilia. It can severely cause psychological traumas for life to those who got abused.
4. Problem with pedophilia. There is some sense of control instead of choice.

____________

End of quote.

None of these problems apply in reality to the girl who was in love with Jeremy Forrest.

... on Language of Otzi (quora)

Q

What language did Otzi the Iceman speak?
https://www.quora.com/What-language-did-Otzi-the-Iceman-speak/answer/Hans-Georg-Lundahl

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Self Employed at Writer and Composer

Answered Nov 7, 2017

Dated to 3300 BC?

Too late to be sure it was Hebrew (since after Babel, technically, 3300 BC would be the Byzantine year of the Flood, but by carbon rise, a sample really from Flood would be dated much older and a sample carbon dated to 3300 BC is more like from 2000 BC, from times of Abraham).

Too early to have a certainly recognisable Etruscan or Rhaetic or Italic or Germanic or Celtic language.

So, clear conclusion : we don’t know.

Sin of Babel - Two Views

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Does my Interpretation of Mahabharata and Ramayana Offend Hindoos? · If Tower of Babel was a Rocket Project, Why was it Called a Tower? · If Tower of Babel was a Rocket Project - What Else Can We Expect? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : Sin of Babel - Two Views · Φιλολoγικά/Philologica again: In case anyone missed this · Correspondence of Hans Georg Lundahl : With Mackey on Haman and on Babel · Creation vs. Evolution : Bricks at Göbekli Tepe or Close? · How My View of Babel Ties in with "Defending Biblical Inerrancy" · Ten Keys to my Idea of Göbekli Tepe as Babel and its Tower as a Rocket · Geographic Spread Before Babel?

My first attempt to make a post here got a postID (that is the numbers for which the text you click is a standin) involving three consecutive sixes. Leaving it to you if it was my mistake being so heinous or my explanation so spot on as to Nimrod's plan ... Nimrod Ben Kush, I have heard, in Hebrew gematria is also the number of Apocalypse 13:18.

The following video was posted 17th May last year, the national holiday of Norway. So, my answer is a bit late.

What was the sin of Babel?
Ripple Of Light Ministries | 17.V.2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea_M3lFEIE4

Challenges

to the producers of the video (answers and possibly ensuing debate will be given separately in other post, if extensive enough):

I

You counted "space ship" as one of the oddest, so, I am in for it.

Now, I'd say "trying to". If Nimrod had the wrong rocket fuel (Uranium) obviously God would delay rocketry to when safer rocket fuels (O2 + H2) were explored.

However, the sin involved is the same as in some of the modern rocket ideology : not trusting God.

Recall that film a few years ago about launching a rocket as a kind of ark, in case there were a new destruction?

According to Josephus, the mainstream Babelic ideology behind the tower was "tower as Ark of salvation" (from next Flood, despite seeing rainbows to remind them).

Now, I don't think rocketry would work very well in either real or modern ideological view of universe, since exoplanets are either too small or too far off.

So, when Cape Canaveral and Bajkonur were launching, they were not immediately doing the same sin, as in voting mistrust on God keeping Earth habitable.

But Nimrod's men were seriously trying an ark for next deluge (mistrusting God) and were probably looking for Uranium in Canada (which God hid by sending the ice age - through the same higher intensity of cosmic radiation, which also gave us the carbon rise from c. 2 pmC at Deluge to present 100 pmC much faster than by the "initial carbon rise" theory).

What are your problems with the rocket theory?

One asset is having an answer ready next time someone asks "if God destroyed a skyscraper project, why would he allow rocketry now?"

II

0:51 Oh, you have the text "and a tower with its top in the heavens"

I have the text a tower, the top whereof may reach to heaven in Douay Rheims and I think the literal Hebrew would be:

"a tower, of which the top into the heavens"

It would seem you take "into" as "in" (or whoever did your translation does - is it KJV?)

III

Where do you consider Babel was?

Have you looked into Göbekli Tepe?

Forwarding about Tommy Robinson

Tommy Robinson? · Forwarding about Tommy Robinson

Tucker: "Britain is not a free country anymore" (w/ Katie Hopkins)
Oppressed Media | 31.V.2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F24JgK0dSx4

REVEALED: Tommy Robinson's shocking prison treatment | Ezra Levant
Rebel Media | 1.VIII.2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pz9ESOrJMHE