Thursday, August 29, 2024

A Protestant End Times Theologian (Good on End Times, at least moderately, Bad on Church History and Ecclesiology)


Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Joe on Judas · A Protestant End Times Theologian (Good on End Times, at least moderately, Bad on Church History and Ecclesiology) · Great Bishop of Geneva! What Does "Being in Babylon" Mean? Being Invisible Only Church? No.

The End Times Temple Is A Literal Place; The Abomination Of Desolation Is a Literal Thing: Email Q&A
EverythingIsFine | 29 Aug 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImYoFILsiAw


0:36 The endtimes Temple of the True God is St. Peter's in Rome.

EverythingIsFine
@everythingisfine6919
I’ve never bothered with Matthew 16:18-19 because the Greek is so starkly clear in stating that Christ is the foundation, NOT Peter. To come to this conclusion one must also ignore Ephesians 2:20 and 1st Peter 2:6 (quoting Isaiah 28:16 which referred to the messiah, Christ) also both pointing to Christ as the cornerstone disingenuously proffering Peter instead, and very dishonesty I might add..

No, the temple is always in Jerusalem, Peter was never a pope and Rome is only a piece of the Beast’s northern empire(as Italy will most certainly be one of the 7 northers kings of the beast empire; 7 toes of iron on Daniel 2) and nothing more in the end times.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@hglundahl
@everythingisfine6919 You are forgetting that verse 19 says Jesus was leaving Peter the keys of the kingdom.

"pointing to Christ as the cornerstone disingenuously proffering Peter instead,"

No Catholic is saying it is Peter instead of Jesus. Here is one of the verses you referred to:

Built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone:
[Ephesians 2:20]

So, the twelve (and seventy) apostles were, along with prophets, part of the foundation, and guess who's the biggest apostle?

Well, none of us say Jesus is left out of the equation! But you do find Peter next to Him!

@everythingisfine6919 "Peter was never a pope"

Acts 2:14 But Peter standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and spoke to them:

EverythingIsFine
We ALL have the keys to heaven with the Gospel at our disposal. Peter was called a small stone, whereas Christ referred to Himself as a mountain/huge craggy stone: in no way can a small stone be a cornerstone.

You are free to continue in the Catholic delusion, but that is your choice. No one here will buy that cult talk tripe.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@everythingisfine6919 "We ALL have the keys to heaven with the Gospel at our disposal."

In Matthew 16:19 I find Jesus was giving them to Peter. Not plural "you" as in "youse" or "y'all" but "thee" ...

I have not seen a single verse in the Bible saying all Christians have the keys.

EverythingIsFine
The keys, the knowledge of Jesus Christ as God, man and that His Work/Death saves us, is available to all who believe it, not just some political org masquerading as the only church of God.

If you’d watch more of my work you’d see I’m not a part of any tradition or denomination but lean only on the Bible as it alone is the way God intended us to know Him and live on earth after faith. I cannot stand any church I’ve ever looked into as they all play games, are extremely worldly, add or subtract from The Word and pretend like it’s all hunky dory.

ANY contradiction or addition/subtraction to/of the Bible is not of God. These truly are the End Times.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@everythingisfine6919 "The keys, the knowledge of Jesus Christ as God, man and that His Work/Death saves us"

That equation is NOT in the Bible, you are adding to the Bible.

Former Dragonette
@FormerDragonette
@hglundahl
What is this that you saying? How is he adding to the Bible? This is the Gospel!

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@FormerDragonette Whether it is or isn't the Gospel is not the point.

The Bible does not say it is the Keys. Nor does the Bible say the Keys is just knowledge of the Gospel.

Actually, the fact we are even talking of "keys of a kingdom" shows Jesus probably had in mind the kind of "political entity masquerading as a church" that EverythingIsFine is allergic against. Even more than a millennium later, the keys to a city is what a mayor holds. If a king gives someone the keys to a city, it means he is naming him mayor. It's about an authority that's either directly political or at least highly like the political type of authority.




[Visible by now]

2:31 The readings from Matthew and Mark are about the OT Temple's abomination of desolation.

3:33 There is a measurable temple in Heavenly Jerusalem.

Jesus is and His saints are reigning there for a medium period of c. 1000 years.

3:51 The daily sacrifice, see Malachi 1:11, it is Holy Mass.

EverythingIsFine
Sorry, all you’ve posted is patently nonsense.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
@everythingisfine6919 Except you are not in a position to say, since you refuse to look into it.

Malachi 1:11 is NOT talking directly of the Sacrifice on Calvary, since it is only in one place and not from the rising to the setting of the Sun, and not among all the nations, even if its consequences are.

It is for basically the same reason not talking of the OT sacrifices.

What is left is that the NT has a sacrifice that's a daily sacrifice. You described its function in the first minutes of the video and only missed it's already there.

EverythingIsFine
Jerusalem is ALWAYS the center of God’s Plan, so gentiles can do whatever cult worship they want, but it means nothing to God.

There is no point in further communication as anyone who worships Mary in any way isn’t a Christian by definition anyhow.

Praying you turn to Christ and abandon that ancient harlot

Hans-Georg Lundahl
Here is what you said:

3:00 — 4:14

we also know from other uh Old Testament examples um Zechariah specifically but we're told that the millennial Temple that Christ will reign from for a thousand years is literally physically measurable even though the the tribulation Temple if you will will be split into bits and basically rendered useless after Armageddon uh we are very clearly told that the son of man the branch Jesus Christ is going to personally rebuild Jerusalem to such a place place that it is its Grandeur is unmatched in any previous variation of the temple but why would he be told that he's rebuilding it if it didn't already exists in the first place plus every description we see of antichrist is him doing something against the temple the temple right and um well okay let's take the daily sacrifice we know from the description of the temple right during tribulation and Revelation and elsewhere that there will be a sacrifice that is set up that is specifically designed to remember what Christ did not a not a forward-looking one a Blasphemous one like this described in Hebrews but one that wraps up the the the totality or the summation if you will of the entire Old Testament law which explicitly points only at Christ nothing else


Best definition of Holy Mass I've so far read from a Protestant.

@everythingisfine6919 "that ancient harlot"

The harlot can't be ancient.

Apocalypse 18 echoes chapters in Isaias and Jeremias that refer to Neo-Babylonian Empire and a time 70 years after the captivity began, 90 years after Assyrian Empire was replaced with Neo-Babylonian Empire.

It's the BRIDE, not the harlot, that's ancient.

@everythingisfine6919 "anyone who worships Mary in any way isn’t a Christian by definition anyhow"

How do you read:

Because he hath regarded the humility of his handmaid; for behold from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed
[Luke 1:48]

μακαριοῦσίν is more than just admit that She is blessed, it is reaching out to Her to congratulate Her.

Att. fut. μακαριῶ Ar.V.429:—bless, deem happy or pronounce happy, congratulate, τινα (LSJ) (μακαρίζω)


5:53 Some are saying this is fulfilled when "Pope Francis" canonised "Pope St. John Paul II"

[See Dimond Brothers]

No comments: