co-authors are other participants quoted. I haven't changed content of thr replies, but quoted it part by part in my replies, interspersing each reply after relevant part. Sometimes I have also changed the order of replies with my retorts, so as to prioritate logical/topical over temporal/chronological connexions. That has also involved conflating more than one message. I have also left out mere insults.
Pages
- Home
- Other blogs, same writer
- A thread from Catholic.com (more may be added)
- Answering Steve Rudd
- Have these dialogues taken place? Yes.
- Copyright issues on blogposts with shared copyright
- I think I wrote a mistaken word somewhere on youtube - or perhaps not
- What is Expertise? Some Things It is Not.
- It Seems Apocalypse is Explained in a Very Relevant Part
- Dialoguing Mainly with Adversaries
- Why do my Posts Right Here Not Answer YOUR Questio...
Saturday, August 3, 2024
Melissa Dougherty Refutes Islam AND Protestantism
Conversation with a Muslim about the Bible, LGBTQ and Salvation.
Melissa Dougherty | 2 Aug. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_T2vbjcFfo
My answers below only concern the first part of the video:
You are making an excellent point against Islam and against Protestantism.
He: "we believe in the Gospel of Jesus, but we don't think we have that today"
= You: "we believe in the oral tradition Paul gave to Thessalonians, but we don't think we have that today"
Answer:
You to him: "How do you know that?"
Me to you: "How do you know that, and doesn't it contradict the Bible text that we do have?"
Again, he about NT text = you about Apostolic Tradition: "some of it was corrupted."
You to him = me to you: "how?"
6:02 Have you asked him when the oldest manuscripts of the Koran are from?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment